Gesan Chem 600 or HumaStar 600: Which Clinical Chemistry System to Choose?

Compare Gesan Chem 600 and HumaStar 600 to determine which clinical chemistry system aligns best with your laboratory's performance, efficiency, and sustainability goals.

*All information is correct as of December 2023

Use the following form for any request whether it is product related or concerning potential distribution partnership.
Fields marked with a * are mandatory. Please take care in entering all data correctly. 

To determine the best clinical chemistry analyzer for your lab, it's important to consider several key factors, including throughput, accuracy, sustainability, and ease of use. In this arena, the Gesan Chem 600 and the HumaStar 600 emerge as noteworthy contenders. This article aims to provide an insightful comparison of these two systems, focusing on their throughput capabilities, reagent management, sample processing efficiency, environmental impact, and more. Our goal is to provide an unbiased analysis to help you choose the best clinical chemistry system for your lab's specific needs and preferences.

Selecting the ideal clinical chemistry analyzer requires careful consideration of several factors. These include not only the technical specifications, but also how these features translate into real-world applications and benefits. The Gesan Chem 600 and HumaStar 600 are both strong candidates, each with unique strengths. Below is a detailed comparison to help you make your decision.

Throughput Max. Tests/Hour

High throughput is critical for laboratories to efficiently handle large test volumes, reduce turnaround times, and improve patient care.

• Gesan Chem 600: Boasts an impressive maximum throughput of 800 tests per hour, making it an ideal choice for high-volume laboratories looking to maximize productivity.
• HumaStar 600: Offers up to 600 tests per hour, slightly less than the Gesan Chem 600, but still well suited for medium to high volume laboratories looking for a balance between speed and accuracy.

Reagent Positions

The number of reagent positions affects a lab's ability to run a wide range of tests simultaneously, offering a broad menu of tests without frequent reagent changes.

• Gesan Chem 600: With 90 reagent positions, it provides ample capacity for a wide range of assays, ideal for laboratories with a broad diagnostic scope.
• HumaStar 600: Has 48 reagent positions, fewer than the Gesan Chem 600, but focuses on efficient use of each position to accommodate labs with specific, high-demand tests.

Reagent Cooling

Maintaining reagent stability through cooling is essential for accurate and reliable test results, especially for temperature-sensitive assays.

• Both the Gesan Chem 600 and HumaStar 600 feature reagent cooling systems, ensuring the integrity of reagents across a wide range of testing conditions.

Sample Positions

Sample position capacity directly affects workflow efficiency by determining how many samples can be processed simultaneously.

• Gesan Chem 600: Offers 115 sample positions, providing exceptional flexibility and efficiency for batch processing, significantly reducing potential bottlenecks during busy laboratory hours.
• HumaStar 600: With 95 sample positions, it offers slightly less capacity than the Gesan Chem 600, but still supports efficient sample processing for most laboratory needs.

Sample Barcode Reader

An internal barcode reader improves sample tracking accuracy, minimizes manual errors, and streamlines lab operations.

• Both systems include internal sample barcode readers, underscoring their commitment to reducing errors and improving diagnostic confidence.

Water Consumption (L/H)

Water consumption is a critical factor for laboratories focused on sustainability and operating costs. Lower consumption indicates a more environmentally friendly and cost-effective analyzer.

• Gesan Chem 600: Has a higher water consumption rate of 25 liters per hour, which may be a concern for laboratories that prioritize environmental sustainability and cost reduction.
• HumaStar 600: Uses less than 5 liters per hour, making it a significantly more sustainable and cost-effective choice in terms of water usage

In summary, when comparing the Gesan Chem 600 and HumaStar 600, laboratories should consider their specific needs, including test volume, test diversity, operational efficiency, and environmental sustainability. The Gesan Chem 600 excels in throughput and sample capacity, making it suitable for high-volume laboratories requiring a wide range of tests. The HumaStar 600, on the other hand, offers environmental efficiency and cost-effective operation, appealing to laboratories committed to sustainability and accurate, reliable testing. Your final choice should reflect your laboratory's unique requirements to ensure that the system you select supports your operational goals and growth.